|
?Do SNPs keep you down? The genetic etiology of ED
|
|
By martinmacinnis, Section Biology Posted on Thu Apr 29th, 2010 at 04:20:12 PM PST
|
 |
|
Background
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a medical condition affecting many men throughout the world. Many lifestyle factors contribute to the risk of ED (e.g. alcohol, drugs, obesity), but there seems to be a genetic component as well [1]. ED is also linked to cardiovascular morbidities (e.g. coronary heart disease, hypertension), and these co-morbidities of ED have genetic etiologies [2]. Without going into too many details, the process of having an erection involves neural and vascular pathways under the control of various chemical agents (e.g. dopamine, oxytocin, nitric oxide), and the final smooth muscle response is governed by a series of transmitter-generating enzymes, receptors, receptor-coupled proteins, and effector enzymes/proteins [1]. Thus there are many potential targets for genetic disturbance, and to date, variants of several SNPs have been associated with ED (e.g. angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), and nitric oxide synthase (eNOS)) [2]. Sildenafil (i.e. Viagra) is a phophodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, which blocks the degradation of cGMP in smooth muscles, allowing relaxation and erection (under the "right" conditions). While Viagra has been a successful drug, some individuals do not respond to it, and effectiveness varies with genotype [2].
|
| Proposal
I propose to study the genetic etiology of ED using a genome wide association study (GWAS). Because of the large environmental effect, I think it would be best to look at early onset (e.g. 30s?) cases of primary ED. This is a more narrow phenotype and easier to assess through GWAS. Many subjects will be needed, but the high prevalence should allow for enough recruitment to ensure sufficient statistical power. The second component of this study would be a GWAS investigating the molecular basis of Viagra responders and non-responders. Each ED subject could be tested for Viagra response, and the group could be divided into responders and non-responders. As the rate of no response is lower, this may have to be a candidate gene approach (but hopefully there would be enough people for a GWAS, perhaps with a more liberal statistical threshold).
Outcomes
ED is linked to other morbidities, so understanding its genetic etiology is important. This study will shed light on the molecular basis of ED, as well as erectile function, and provide new targets for pharmaceutical and medical interventions. Importantly, Phizer's Viagra patent is set to expire in ~ 2 years, and identification of new drugs for ED and new drugs for Viagra non-responders would be a profitable venture.
References
1. Hedlund, P. (2003). Genes and erectile function. Curr. Opin. Urol, 13:397-403.
2. Eisenhardt, et al. (2008). Urologe, 47: 1579-1581.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|