Experiment Bank - The site for free exchange, review, and discussion of novel scientific experiments Front Page ? Everything ? News ? Wish list ? Help ? FAQ
?Benign vs. Malignant Tumors

genomics
By Bioinfkat, Section Biology
Posted on Thu Apr 29th, 2010 at 12:56:38 PM PST
Examining the genome and/or transcriptome of a benign mass in addition to malignant and matched normal tissue can shed light on the process of evolution of a normal tissue to a cancerous one.

 

A tumor found in a patient is first classified into one of the two broad categories of benign or malignant. Benign tumors are the ones that grow locally without invading nearby tissues. Malignant tumors, on the other hand, do invade the tissues around them and often they leave their primary site to invade a more distant organ. The benign tumors are rarely the cause of death; they might have some side effects such as pushing against the organs around them or secreting abnormal amount of hormones, for instance, thyroid or pituitary benign masses can cause hormone imbalances. But most cancer-related mortalities derive from malignant tumors and as a result the majority of the effort in cancer research has been focused on these malignant masses. In a typical whole genome/transcriptome analysis, the sequence of the malignant tumor is compared with the sequence of matched normal tissue of the patient. However, we know that the great majority of the primary tumors start as harmless benign tumors and over a period of time, after accumulating more mutations, they turn into malignant tumors.

I propose the idea of examining not only the genomes and transcriptomes of malignant tumors and their matched normal tissues but also the benign masses and their matched normal tissues and, if possible, their matched malignant tissues. A normal tissue goes through many stages of transformation, in most cases this will include a benign tumor stage, before it becomes malignant. Sequencing and comparing a benign tissue, its malignant form, when it appears, and the matched normal tissue can shed light on the process of evolution and the mutations responsible for causing the cancer phenotype.

< TE evolution (12 comments) | Why African-Americans Dominant Basketball (4 comments) >



View: Display: Sort:
Benign vs. Malignant Tumors | 4 comments (4 topical, 0 editorial)
[new] patient samples (none / 0) (#1)
by smile on Wed Apr 28th, 2010 at 10:12:02 PM PST
(User Info)

First of all, I think it will be very difficult in sample collecting step. Most of the time, the benign tumors will have gone unnoticed until it become symptomatic or life-threatening. Also, for a malignant tumor, there is an issue of heterogeneity of cell populations. Do you have any idea of how to solve these problems?



[new] RE: patient samples (none / 0) (#3)
by Bioinfkat on Thu Apr 29th, 2010 at 11:00:40 AM PST
(User Info)

Thanks for the comment. You are correct about the tumor heterogeneity issue. Although, this problem is not unique to this proposal. Any whole genome/transcriptome study that's conducted right now on cancer tumors suffers from this problem. I don't believe there is any good solution for it right now. We just have to wait until the technology is developed enough that we can sequence single cells.

As for sample collection, it would be very nice to have a benign tumor which progresses into a malignant one over time. This obviously means we have to study patients over a longer period of time. Some benign tumors are discovered early on. As mentioned in the text the ones that cause hormonal imbalances can be detected fairly early on. Or tumors which might show up in regular check ups such as ovarian cysts. But even if it is not possible to collect matched benign and malignant tumors, sequencing a benign and comparing it with the matched normal tissue should still give us a pretty good idea of the mutations accumulated in the tissue.

[ Parent ]


[new] longitudinal study? (none / 0) (#2)
by Christine Yang on Thu Apr 29th, 2010 at 10:15:36 AM PST
(User Info)

I know there are studies that sequenced primary and metastatic tumours, but not too sure about transcriptomes.

But regarding the samples, I wonder if you need to follow people before the disease onset... because you wanted normal matched tissues. When an individual has a benign tumour, how normal is the unaffected portion of the same tissue? Do you think the unaffected portion also has some alteration due to the benign tumour close-by? Also, as mentioned by the previous comment, if we notice the cancer too late (metastasis), often we don't know the primary site.



[new] RE: longitudinal study (none / 0) (#4)
by Bioinfkat on Thu Apr 29th, 2010 at 11:20:18 AM PST
(User Info)

Yes transcriptome sequencing has lagged behind genome analysis. Part of the problem is that it is difficult to assemble the transcriptome from the sequencing reads. Different genes are expressed at different levels so the depth of coverage will be different for each one and if the coverage is too low, it becomes difficult to tell apart a SNP from a sequencing error.

You are absolutely right, it is not always easy to acquire the matched normal tissue. It's easier if the tumor is solid but depending on what tissue it is located in and how big the tumor is, it might not be possible to get the normal tissue. I'm not 100% sure about whether the adjacent normal tissue will somehow be affected as well. I think it is possible that maybe we just think the tissue is normal because the morphology is normal but in reality it has also been accumulating mutations. This is an interesting comment! Thanks.

[ Parent ]


Benign vs. Malignant Tumors | 4 comments (4 topical, 0 editorial)
View: Display: Sort:
?+?Menu
? create account
? faq
? search

?+?Login
Make a new account
Username:
Password:

?+?Related Links
? More on genomics
? Also by Bioinfkat

BC Cancer Agency Genome Sequence Centre SourceForge Logo Powered by Scoop
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest ? 1999 The Management

create account | faq | search