Experiment Bank - The site for free exchange, review, and discussion of novel scientific experiments Front Page ? Everything ? News ? Wish list ? Help ? FAQ
?The evolution of Pangaea

genomics
By fishes, Section Biology
Posted on Fri Apr 30th, 2010 at 01:34:03 AM PST
A number of hypotheses have been put forth as to how the continents as we know them today, first came to exist. The most popular existing theory is the `continental drift theory'. This theory suggests that one giant super-continent existed on planet earth before separation of the continental shelf. This super continent has been named Pangaea. It is thought that Pangaea began to break apart approximately 225-200 million years ago.

 

I propose a study that utilizes synchronous coefficient of drag alteration (SCODA), a relatively new nucleic acid purification technique, in order to examine soil samples from several dispersed geographic locations from each of the seven continents. The robust purification of nucleic acids followed by high-throughput sequencing of samples and the use of known values for mutation rates, will allow for the comparison of microbial DNA from across the world. These comparisons can draw a number of interesting conclusions. First, the data will infer phylogeny of micro species within each continent. This may lend insight into intra continental historical human migration patterns. Second, the data will infer phylogeny of micro species between continents, thereby lending insight into the evolutionary timeline of continental drift. Additionally, intermediate continental patterns may be inferred. This can allow insight into the ecological climate of the planet at different time points. It is interesting to gain insight into the evolutionary history of the geography of our planet. Obtaining increasingly precise calculations of the continental drift time-line not only teaches us about the history of the land we walk on, but it may also lend insight into the dynamics of the ecological climate over the lifetime of earth.
< miRNA-gene interaction network (6 comments) | Myelodysplastic Syndromes & Lenalidomide (2 comments) >



View: Display: Sort:
The evolution of Pangaea | 6 comments (6 topical, 0 editorial)
[new] Questions (none / 0) (#1)
by xerro five on Tue Mar 23rd, 2010 at 05:52:09 PM PST
(User Info)

Two questions I was hoping you could help me with: 1) Wouldn't dispersal and mixing of species between continents blur the results (especially given modern-day travel and movement of natural products around the world)? 2) Is bacterial evolution too fast to track this far back? I ask #2 because I recall a discussion where the notion of tracking virus evolution further back than a few hundred years seemed pretty impossible so I wonder if the also very fast-evolving bacteria may have a lesser, but still considerable problem.



[new] Dispersal and mixing (none / 0) (#3)
by Aina on Thu Mar 25th, 2010 at 01:11:31 PM PST
(User Info)

In realtion to question 1, wouldn't this just be a question of where to obatain your sample. Find an area where the chances of this dispersal and mixing is highly unlikely? Areas "untouched" by humans...

[ Parent ]


[new] I agree! (none / 0) (#5)
by Bioinfkat on Fri Mar 26th, 2010 at 05:40:51 PM PST
(User Info)

I agree with the fact that bacteria evolve very quickly and as mentioned in another comment there is also the problem of lateral gene transfer. I like the idea behind this proposal but I'm not quite sure how reliable the results of such an experiment will be.

[ Parent ]


[new] microbial evolution (none / 0) (#2)
by Christine Yang on Tue Mar 23rd, 2010 at 10:27:08 PM PST
(User Info)

A general issue that comes up in studying evolution of bacteria using DNA sequence alignment is lateral gene transfer. Aside from microbes in the soil, are there any other organisms that you think would be useful in terms of estimating the drift time?



[new] Reply to first 2 comments (none / 0) (#4)
by Earthworm Jim on Thu Mar 25th, 2010 at 03:40:45 PM PST
(User Info)

perhaps using something other than microbes would be a more feasible idea. The idea as a whole is neat but perhaps looking into another type of organism that has been around for the 200-225 million years and is not as susceptible to the lateral gene transfer and rapid evolution of microbes. (dinosaurs?!?! just kidding)



[new] fossils? (none / 0) (#6)
by fishes on Wed Mar 31st, 2010 at 02:00:53 PM PST
(User Info)

thanks for all of your comments. This is all very true. Lateral gene transfer is an issue worth mentioning as it would blur the results. What about canning the idea of microbes and using fossil DNA? This could be cool! Comments?

[ Parent ]


The evolution of Pangaea | 6 comments (6 topical, 0 editorial)
View: Display: Sort:
?+?Menu
? create account
? faq
? search

?+?Login
Make a new account
Username:
Password:

?+?Related Links
? More on genomics
? Also by fishes

BC Cancer Agency Genome Sequence Centre SourceForge Logo Powered by Scoop
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest ? 1999 The Management

create account | faq | search